(Technology note: This edition of the Roundup has lots and lots of pictures. If you have trouble viewing it in email form, or if the photos are taking a while to download, please go here and you will be able to read it on the Oregon Roundup website.)
Life is a journey and Oregon Governor Kate Brown has been on a significant eyewear journey that now approaches, if not defines, the apex of liberal glasses. Below, we will first seek to define the term “liberal glasses,” and, second, follow Kate Brown on her path to those beauties in the photo above.
Liberal glasses defined
I notice (my wife would say obsess about) weird things. There’s my ongoing fascination with Toyota Priuses, the people who drive them, and the speed, or, more often, the lack of speed, with which they drive them.
There’s the frequency with which I think of the older woman - an exceptionally nice older woman - who used to live in our neighborhood and drove around with a life-size decal of Ruth Bader Ginsburg (may she rest in peace) affixed to the rear passenger window of her Audi station wagon, as though the nice older woman was perpetually “Driving Miss Ginsburg.”
And then there’s the glasses, or really a particular style of glasses, by which I mean eyeglasses. I refer here to liberal glasses. Oh, you don’t call them that? How not weird of you. Well, I do, and apparently others do as well. That repository of all that’s valuable in Western Civilization, Urban Dictionary, defines “liberal glasses” thus:
Liberal glasses are the dark and thick-rimmed glasses, typically square in shape, favored by liberals. They are worn in an attempt to appear intellectually superior. Also called "hipster glasses." It is a safe bet that when somebody wears them, they ascribe to a left-leaning ideology. The majority of people who wear liberal glasses are also white.
Can’t wait for the ads I’ll be served thanks to that Google search. Anyway, I’m not sure about the square part or the white part,
but you get the idea. Liberal glasses are prominent, defining accessories. No wire-rimmed, shrinking violets of face-wear, liberal glasses are, as they say, loud and proud.
These,
these (especially in United Nations blue),
and these are liberal glasses,
but definitely not these.
The wearing by some non-liberals of liberal glasses
may be causing a backlash among some liberals,
but any such trend is, as yet, ill-defined (e.g., is there a difference between progressive glasses and liberal glasses?) and outside the scope of this study. We have more important matters to which to attend.
On Kate Brown’s Glasses
Oregon Governor Kate Brown has spent her political career playing catchup in the liberal coastal elite eyewear game. She grew up in Minnesota (the accent is noticeable when she says “mask,” which is, um, not infrequently), which is neither coastal nor known for its coffee shops, which are important - some say essential - incubators of liberal glasses culture. She originally became governor in 2015, when, as Secretary of State, she succeeded to the governorship when forever-Governor John Kitzhaber resigned in the face of an ethics investigation. As such, she has not participated in an open Democratic gubernatorial primary that would have forced her to tack left with her eyewear to compete with the likes of Oregon House Speaker Tina Kotek, who for all I know was born wearing liberal glasses.
Kate Brown, to her credit, has largely overcome these obstacles, as we shall see. To truly appreciate where she is with her eyewear today, we must first acknowledge where she started in her journey.
1993
Bill Clinton had, the year before, wrested control of the Democratic Party from the liberals, and charted a more moderate, if handsy, course for the party. Brown’s understated eyewear fits the times. They say, “I’m not saying the era of big government is over, but I’m not saying it’s not over.”
1998
A lot’s changed in five years. Brown is now Oregon Senate Majority Leader and is sporting a new look, without any glasses at all. Indeed, for over a decade, Brown would be frequently if not always photographed without glasses.
While this might seem a setback, as we shall see, Brown appears to have recognized the error of her previous Republican-passable glasses and pressed the reset button. Hard. She needed a fresh canvas with which to work and this time in the glasses-free wilderness would pay big dividends in the future.
2012
Here we go. These are surely not liberal glasses, but they’re glasses. Brown is now Secretary of State, Barack Obama is about to win his second term as president, and this barely-there number whispers, “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.”
2013
Now things are getting interesting. Brown eschews the understated glasses of a year prior and announces she means business with these vaguely retro specs. The wide lenses, slightly blue color and prominent fasteners at the edges announce an embrace of eyewear something to be celebrated, not minimized. There is a “I may look like a 1960s librarian but that makes sense because I’m the Secretary of State, which is kind of like being the librarian for all of Oregon.”
An explicitly retro look has served as a gateway to truly liberal glasses for many. As we shall see, they served this function admirably for Brown.
2016
Brown, now governor, takes an important step from her prior, retro style to a simpler and more modern look. These glasses do not hark back to an earlier era - they stand on their own as a forward-looking fashion accessory. They are prominent but lacking in unnecessary adornment. There is nothing about these glasses to stand between Brown and identifying and ferreting out injustices like businesses greedily failing to adequately fund the state government.
As a bonus, Washington Governor Jay Inslee appears on the right side of the photo which is fitting because his glasses simply don’t measure up. He gets points for their unusually narrow shape, but he looks like he’d be at home in one of those greedy corporate boardrooms. He looks like Rick Perry but with more conservative glasses, which, I mean, come on.
2020
The glasses aren’t what first strikes the viewer of this photograph, but we’re not here to talk about dubious mask decisions. Here we return to a retro look, but a different retro look. In the first year of the pandemic, these art deco-ish glasses remind one of the Empire State Building and thus New York and thus Andrew Cuomo (before, you know, all the stuff) and definitely not Ron DeSantis. Somehow, at least in context with the mask, the glasses say, “In this state, we recognize freedom for what it is: an f-word.”
2021
Now these, these, are liberal glasses. Where does one start? As hexagons (hexagons!) they reject the patriarchal and false confinement to round or square. The colors, a dark red coupled with a lighter red or perhaps pink, mix aggressiveness with caring, as though saying to Republicans, “I can go toe-to-toe with you on red but also have a softer, caring side which you obviously don’t.”
The glasses express two important things at once:
Omicron, I’m ready for you. By the time you show up in Oregon I will have locked the place down so tightly dogs would be required to show proof of vaccinations to go to a dog park if their owners weren’t forbidden from leaving the house to take them to the dog park; and,
I’m open to either a late-first-term Biden administration appointment or service on the board of a non-profit fighting against the disproportionate impact of climate change on historically under-served populations of unionized public sector employees because, you know, I’m term-limited here.
Liberal glasses will never be the same after this. It took decades, but Brown has redefined the category. Don’t ever let anyone tell you she’s not a transformational leader.
I have enjoyed getting a small taste of your perspective since signing up to your blog. I signed up to get some insights from our former Bend Mayor, and folks more conservative than me. Context before reading into my words too much. I am a moderate, let me start there. I have voted for liberals and conservatives. I own guns, I own a truck and an electric car (not a Prius), I have worked with my hands my whole life, and in offices for some of it, I’ve started my own companies, I hunt and fish, I like paying taxes (sinful I know), I want to be left alone by the govt in my personal affairs, I voted for Joe Biden, I work in renewable energy and I support lot’s of progressive policies, but not all of them. (Also, full disclosure I got Lasik, so I don't have glasses now, but I know the process of choosing them well).
I am struggling with the point of this post (I suppose this falls under the "whatever else comes to mind" section of the blog description). The connection you draw here is dubious and petty at best, and veiled demagoguery at worst. If it's an attempt at humor, it lands rather flat. It does however leave the reader with lasting images of the former Mayor of Bend hunched over sprawling and scattered notebooks in a small dark room backdropped by walls of paper clippings, Post-It noted ceilings, and strings pinned from thick round glasses to liberals, then from there to lizard people and Q.
Honestly, it reads as if you take this seriously, which is hard to imagine given the ridiculousness of the premise. But, if you do in fact take this as a real analysis of Liberal Fashion, then it again seems like you missed the mark. You don't establish any casual connections between the style of glasses and one's political leaning as far as I can tell. It just seems like a way of dumping on Gov. Kate Brown, and I am no apologist for her. The connection feels forced, and thin, like butter spread over too much bread. If I didn't know any better, I might say that you are instead manufacturing outrage out of thin air (works for your audience maybe, but tastes like $&!+ to me). Take your issue with Priuses for a second from this and other posts (we'll get back to the glasses in a moment); why spend ANY time being concerned with a specific vehicle and the safe speed choices of others? It's utterly harmless to drive slowly and in a Prius however much you want to turn this into a thing, it isn't. So upon reading this, rather than being mad at Priuses, I am instead left cringing at your determined need to be annoyed by your own self fulfilling ( and not self evident) Liberal tropes. I find it particularly illuminating to witness you being all ruffled up by consumer and behavior choices that have zero impact on you or the politics of Oregon. It just feels out of place in a blog called the Oregon Roundup, and by an attorney and ex Mayor no less. Seriously, a small car driving the speed limit imposing very little in the way of impact on its surroundings bothers you? How bazaar. I can only assume this bothers other staunch conservatives, and for the life of me I can't figure why.
Getting back to political ocular fashion; this idea that "Liberal glasses" are "dark and thick-rimmed glasses" but wait... Roger Stone? Even your own image and comment about Former Energy Secretary Rick Perry wearing thick dark square rimmed glasses illustrates my point, is it the exception that...proves the rule? Either way it's confusing. It's just so strange to believe there is a relationship here. And again, you say that " No wire-rimmed, shrinking violets of face-wear," yet in your own image, you feature Rep. Andria Ocassio Cortez wearing wire rimmed glasses. It appears as though you are creating spurious connections to support your notion that there is a pattern here; Apophenia. It's fashion, and I think we can all agree fashion is disconnected from reality - Liberal or Conservative. As to the astonishing depths you’ve gone to dig into Kate Brown’s eyewear over the years, I am at a loss for words. Why? Why does this register for you, when there are so many real issues? If this post were overtly funny and self aware, I would just ignore it, but I found your sincerity to be rather disturbing. My guess, but I will not be spending any time on researching this, is that the trend is purely a function of fashion changes over the same period. Yep, the truth is usually boring and devoid of conspiracy.
My broader point is that this is uninformative and serves only to divide. I’d be more interested in the thought-substance of conservative former mayors, yet perhaps this is the "whatever else" view inside your mind, in which case, how sad.